Janice Rutledge Janz, Ph.D, Mary M. Banbury, Ph.D
JAASEP 1(2) (2006) 5-25
Abstract
Researchers have long been disconcerted with the lack of a clear definition and objective criteria in identifying students with behavior problems (Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, 1999; Forness & Kavale, 2000). As a safeguard, federal and state laws mandate the use of multidisciplinary teams to reduce the inappropriate and discriminatory referral and placement of students into special education (Knotek, 2003, p. 2). It is this team that makes the decisions throughout the formal identification process; no single procedure is used as the sole criterion for determining whether a student is a student with an exceptionality (Louisiana Department of Education, 2000, p. 23). However, the safeguard is not fail-safe. Tensions may arise when there are opposing viewpoints, divergent interpretations of events or circumstances, and, in particular, competing philosophical orientations among team members.
Keywords:Specialists, Behavior Problems, Emotional Disturbances, School Psychologists, Environmental Influences, Student Evaluation, Urban Schools, Clinical Diagnosis, Semi Structured Interviews, Experience, Attitude Measures, Caseworkers, Social Work, Rural Schools, Student Personnel Workers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.6
